Averroes Ai Automated Visual inspection software
PartnersCompany
Start Free Trial
Image
Image
Back
Data Labeling

Top 8 Data Labeling Tools & Software (2025)

Logo
Averroes
Jul 24, 2025
Top 8 Data Labeling Tools & Software (2025)

You can have the best model in the world and still ship garbage if your data’s mislabeled, scattered, or stuck in a spreadsheet. 

The right labeling tool doesn’t just save time. It keeps your entire pipeline from going sideways. We’ve tested the clunky, the overhyped, and the surprisingly solid. Here’s a breakdown of eight platforms that deliver – and what they’re each actually good at.

Our Top 3 Picks

SuperAnnotate

Best All-in-One Platform for Multimodal Projects

SuperAnnotate

VIEW NOW
Label Studio

Best Open-Source Flexibility for Custom Workflows

Label Studio

VIEW NOW
Labellerr

Fastest AI-Assisted Labeling at Scale

Labellerr

VIEW NOW

1. SuperAnnotate

Best for: Scalable, enterprise-grade annotation across multimodal datasets

SuperAnnotate is one of the most comprehensive platforms on the market for data labeling and dataset management. 

Unlike tools that specialize in one type of annotation, it’s built to handle almost every modality – image, video, text, audio, 3D, geospatial – while offering customizable workflows, human-in-the-loop review, and seamless project management.

Where it really shines is in high-volume, high-complexity environments: think AI in healthcare, autonomous vehicles, or satellite imagery. 

But with that depth comes a learning curve. For small teams or beginners, it can be a lot. For enterprise teams working across multiple data types with tight QA requirements, it’s one of the most complete platforms available.

Features

  • Multimodal annotation: Image, video, audio, text, geospatial, and 3D support
  • AI-assisted labeling: Smart pre-labeling using foundation or custom models
  • Custom workflows: Drag-and-drop pipeline design, role-based task management
  • Project collaboration: Real-time annotation, workload tracking, vendor oversight
  • Quality assurance tools: Gold-standard scoring, benchmarking, consensus workflows
  • Integrations: API, Python SDK, cloud/on-premise deployment (AWS, GCP, Azure)
  • Security: ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, SSO, IP whitelisting, and 2FA
  • Marketplace access: Find and manage external annotation vendors easily

Pros:

  • Multimodal flexibility: One of the only platforms that does it all well
  • Strong QA system: Built-in workflows for validation, benchmarking, and error review
  • Enterprise-ready: Handles large teams, high volumes, and secure deployments with ease
  • Customizable pipelines: Tailor every step of your annotation and review process
  • Excellent UI/UX: Interface is intuitive even for complex tasks

Cons:

  • Steep learning curve: Beginners may feel overwhelmed without structured onboarding
  • Opaque pricing: Advanced features require paid plans and enterprise pricing is not public
  • Resource-heavy: Large-scale deployments may require significant compute and storage
  • Limited offline/mobile access: Primarily web-based, not ideal for field or remote annotation
  • Integration friction: Custom setups or third-party tool integration can require support

Score: 4.7/5

View Now

2. Dataloop

Best for: End-to-end automation and large-scale annotation workflows

Dataloop is a heavy-duty data labeling and management platform designed for teams building and scaling AI projects on unstructured data. 

While most platforms focus on getting you through the annotation process, Dataloop supports the entire ML lifecycle – from task design and QA to dataset versioning, automation, and performance feedback.

Its strength lies in enterprise-grade control and flexibility. You can spin up custom workflows, deploy event-driven pipelines, and query millions of files in milliseconds 

But it’s not built for plug-and-play simplicity. Dataloop works best when you have a complex vision pipeline, a sizable team, and infrastructure to match.

Features

  • Multi-format annotation: Label images, video, audio, and text with intuitive tools
  • AI-assisted workflows: Pre-labeling, automated QC, and model feedback loops
  • Real-time collaboration: QA reviews, consensus tasks, and annotator-manager feedback
  • Data management: Sub-second queries, hierarchical taxonomies, version control
  • Custom pipelines: Build serverless functions and event-based automations via Python SDK
  • Integrated model feedback: Tie label quality directly to model performance
  • Role-based access: Secure task distribution, real-time tracking, and performance dashboards
  • Cloud-native scaling: Handles petabytes of data with cloud storage sync (AWS, Azure, GCP)
  • Security & compliance: GDPR-compliant, encrypted, enterprise-authentication ready

Pros:

  • Built for scale: Easily handles huge datasets, deep taxonomies, and long project timelines
  • Automation-first: Streamlines workflows with AI pre-labeling and serverless customization
  • Enterprise flexibility: Tailor every layer of the stack, from tasks to interface
  • End-to-end visibility: Real-time analytics and QA tools offer strong operational oversight
  • Versioning + metadata: Track data lineage and model iterations cleanly

Cons:

  • High complexity: Feature depth means onboarding can be intense without support
  • Enterprise-leaning pricing: Smaller teams may find cost and capabilities misaligned
  • Cloud-dependency: Built for the cloud; not ideal if you’re on strict infrastructure policies
  • Visual-first: NLP support exists, but computer vision gets most of the firepower

Score: 4.6/5

View Now

3. Labelbox

Best for: Enterprise teams managing complex, high-volume, multimodal datasets

Labelbox is built for AI teams that need more than just a labeling interface. It’s a full-stack platform combining annotation tools, AI-assisted labeling, quality control workflows, and access to human annotators all under one roof. 

From bounding boxes and segmentation to geospatial and RLHF tasks, Labelbox is engineered to handle the data complexity behind today’s most ambitious ML models.

Where it really excels is in the integration of annotation with model training and evaluation. Its human-in-the-loop and active learning workflows help teams fine-tune both data and model performance in tandem. 

But with all that capability comes cost and complexity. For large-scale projects and enterprise AI teams, it’s one of the most complete platforms available. For smaller teams, it may feel like using a jet engine to power a go-kart.

Features

  • Multimodal support: Image, video, text, audio, documents, geospatial, chat-based data
  • Model-assisted labeling: Foundation or custom models pre-label data for human review
  • Advanced annotation tools: Full ontology design, segmentation, transcription, sentiment tagging
  • Built-in QA tools: Ground truth comparison, consensus scoring, anomaly detection
  • Human-in-the-loop workflows: Manual review + iterative feedback from model performance
  • Project & team management: Role-based permissions, dashboards, workforce orchestration
  • Enterprise integrations: API/SDK access, scalable infrastructure, cloud storage compatibility
  • Specialized modules: RLHF, red teaming, generative AI evaluation pipelines

Pros:

  • End-to-end platform: Covers the full data prep lifecycle – not just annotation
  • Scales with you: Works with internal teams, third-party vendors, or managed service providers
  • Strong QA and governance: Multi-layer review systems help ensure label reliability
  • Model feedback loops: Built-in tools to test and refine model performance using label data
  • Industry-agnostic: Versatile enough for healthcare, defense, autonomous driving, and more

Cons:

  • High cost of entry: Best suited for well-funded teams with complex data needs
  • Steep learning curve: Onboarding and configuration can take time to get right
  • Cloud-only: Offline workflows and environments with limited internet access aren’t ideal
  • Heavy for simple projects: Might be overkill for one-off or narrowly scoped tasks
  • Reliance on human annotators: Managed services are powerful but may affect cost/timeline

Pros:

  • End-to-end platform: Covers the full data prep lifecycle – not just annotation
  • Scales with you: Works with internal teams, third-party vendors, or managed service providers
  • Strong QA and governance: Multi-layer review systems help ensure label reliability
  • Model feedback loops: Built-in tools to test and refine model performance using label data
  • Industry-agnostic: Versatile enough for healthcare, defense, autonomous driving, and more

Cons:

  • High cost of entry: Best suited for well-funded teams with complex data needs
  • Steep learning curve: Onboarding and configuration can take time to get right
  • Cloud-only: Offline workflows and environments with limited internet access aren’t ideal
  • Heavy for simple projects: Might be overkill for one-off or narrowly scoped tasks
  • Reliance on human annotators: Managed services are powerful but may affect cost/timeline

Score: 4.6/5

View Now

4. Label Studio

Best for: Open-source teams needing flexibility and full control over labeling pipelines

Label Studio stands out in the data labeling space for one major reason: you can mold it into whatever you need it to be. 

Developed by Heartex, it’s an open-source, multimodal labeling platform built for maximum customization. Whether you’re labeling images, audio, video, or text (or all of them at once) Label Studio gives you the scaffolding to build exactly the workflow your team requires.

But with that flexibility comes responsibility. While the drag-and-drop UI and documentation are solid, getting up and running (especially with ML-assisted labeling or cloud storage) takes some technical effort. 

Still, for academic teams, research labs, and ML engineers looking for extensibility without vendor lock-in, Label Studio is one of the most capable tools out there.

Features

  • Multimodal annotation: Supports image, text, video, audio, and more
  • Custom interface builder: Design custom workflows using XML config or visual editor
  • ML-assisted labeling: Plug in models for pre-labeling and active learning
  • Cloud + local support: Label data stored on S3, GCP, or local servers
  • Team collaboration tools: Role-based access, review workflows, and project dashboards
  • Data manager: Filter, sort, and review annotations within the platform
  • Export/import flexibility: Use JSON, COCO, CSV, and other common formats
  • Enterprise edition: Adds SSO, SOC2 compliance, analytics, SLA support

Pros:

  • Truly customizable: From interface to logic, you control every step
  • Strong modality support: Ideal for teams labeling across multiple data types
  • ML integration-ready: Works well with active learning and custom model feedback
  • Robust API & SDK: Easily automatable and scriptable for dev-focused teams
  • Open-source advantage: Free to use, no lock-in, and strong community support

Cons:

  • Steeper setup curve: Initial configuration and deployment can be technical
  • Interface complexity: Highly flexible, but not always beginner-friendly
  • Limited built-in automation: ML-assisted labeling requires model setup separately
  • Scaling considerations: Large-scale, self-hosted deployments may need tuning
  • Enterprise features gated: Security, governance, and analytics require paid license

Score: 4.5/5

View Now

5. Labellerr

Best for: High-speed AI-assisted labeling across diverse data types at enterprise scale

Labellerr combines speed, automation, and versatility in a platform built for teams tackling large-scale, multi-format annotation projects. 

Designed with AI-assisted labeling at its core, it significantly reduces the need for manual effort by using models to pre-label data, sometimes requiring users to touch just 10–20% of the dataset.

Beyond speed, Labellerr also emphasizes accuracy and collaboration, with smart QA, customizable workflows, and analytics dashboards that give project leads control over quality and productivity. 

It’s especially well-suited for enterprises in automotive, healthcare, and retail, though the high price tag and occasional integration gaps may be a hurdle for smaller teams.

Features

  • AI-assisted labeling: Pre-labels data with built-in models; manual input needed only for a fraction
  • Multi-format support: Images (detection, segmentation, tracking), text (NER, sentiment), audio, PDFs, and video
  • Workflow customization: Smart routing of tasks to optimal labelers based on predicted speed and cost
  • Quality control tools: Labeler scoring, review queues, consensus models, and anomaly detection
  • Collaboration: Real-time team tools, user roles, and permission control
  • Analytics & dashboards: Smart QA, real-time project tracking, and version control
  • Enterprise-grade security: Privacy protocols for handling sensitive or proprietary datasets
  • Data augmentation & feedback loops: Built-in tools to strengthen model training and iteration

Pros:

  • Incredibly fast: AI-driven automation drastically cuts annotation time and cost
  • Precision-focused: Multiple QA layers support consistent labeling at up to 99.5% accuracy
  • Broad data support: Handles virtually every common data type in AI pipelines
  • Built for scale: Suitable for teams managing millions (or billions) of data points
  • User-friendly UI: Intuitive for both newcomers and experienced annotators

Cons:

  • Limited integrations: Fewer out-of-the-box connections than some rivals
  • Steep curve for advanced setups: Complex workflows may need onboarding or training
  • Occasional latency: Some users report slowdowns during heavy processing
  • Premium pricing: The Pro plan starts at $499/month, and enterprise plans require sales contact

Score: 4.4/5

View Now

6. V7

Best for: High-precision computer vision projects in healthcare, manufacturing, and science

V7 is a polished, AI-powered data labeling platform with serious strengths in computer vision, video annotation, and complex imaging workflows. 

Whether you’re working with medical scans, microscope footage, or structured document layouts, V7’s auto-annotation tools and workflow automations help speed up labeling without sacrificing precision.

It stands out for intuitive UX and thoughtful features like auto-tracking, object similarity tagging, and advanced QA pipelines. 

While it supports some text-based formats, the platform leans heavily into vision-first applications, making it ideal for use cases like medical imaging, retail analytics, and autonomous systems. 

Its free tier makes it accessible, while the enterprise version scales with teams handling thousands of images per week.

Features

  • Auto-annotation tools: Segment Anything (SAM2), V7 Auto-Annotate, polygon automation
  • Video auto-tracking: Handles object occlusion, reentry, and continuity
  • Object similarity tagging: Find and annotate repetitive items (e.g., cells, components)
  • Complex data format support: DICOM, SVS, PDFs, microscope and architectural imagery
  • Active learning workflows: Entropy sampling, margin-based prioritization, QA routing
  • Collaboration tools: Real-time annotation, role-based workflows, consensus review
  • Automation pipelines: OCR, document processing, pipeline builder
  • Integrations: AWS, Databricks, Voxel51, Python SDK
  • Annotation services: On-demand network of 40,000 trained annotators

Pros:

  • Best-in-class vision tools: Especially strong in segmentation, tracking, and medical annotation
  • Fast + intuitive UI: Minimal learning curve, praised for speed and clarity
  • Smart automation: Cuts labeling time while improving consistency
  • Handles niche data types well: Tailored for healthcare, automotive, and scientific imaging
  • QA workflows are built in: No extra tools needed to manage reviewer loops
  • Responsive support: Strong documentation, V7 Academy, and human help

Cons:

  • Filtering large datasets: Performance dips when browsing high-volume document sets
  • Export options: Some users want more flexibility across toolchains
  • Occasional platform lag: Reported during updates or heavy usage
  • Fewer multimodal capabilities: Less ideal for projects involving audio, chat, or geospatial data
  • Limited fine-tune control in consensus: Review workflows could use more precision tools

Score: 4.4/5

View Now

7. Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth

Best for: Scalable, hybrid human + machine labeling in AWS-native workflows

Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth is AWS’s answer to the labeling bottleneck. And it’s built for scale. 

It combines machine learning-assisted pre-labeling with flexible human-in-the-loop workflows, making it well-suited for teams that need high-accuracy labels across diverse data types like images, video, text, and 3D point clouds.

The real advantage here is integration. If your ML pipeline already lives in AWS, Ground Truth fits in natively – from ingest to annotation to model deployment. It’s designed for volume, with active learning to minimize effort and real-time dashboards for tracking label quality. 

However, users working on niche tasks or requiring deeply customized workflows might find its templated approach limiting without custom dev work.

Features

  • Hybrid labeling: ML-powered pre-labeling with human validation via Mechanical Turk, vendors, or private teams
  • Active learning: Focuses human effort where models are least confident
  • Multimodal support: Images, text, video, and 3D point cloud annotations
  • Annotation templates & customization: Use built-in workflows or design your own UIs
  • Consolidation tools: Merges multiple annotator inputs into a final consensus label
  • Real-time metrics: Dashboards to track progress, quality, and workforce performance
  • AWS-native integration: Seamlessly works with S3, SageMaker training, and deployment services
  • Security & compliance: Enterprise-grade data privacy and access controls

Pros:

  • Machine + human hybrid model: Boosts speed and accuracy with less manual effort
  • End-to-end AWS integration: Ideal for teams already operating within AWS
  • Highly scalable: Adapts to projects of any size with robust workforce management
  • Active learning optimization: Smart use of labeling resources where they matter most
  • Support for many data types: Versatile enough for CV, NLP, robotics, and beyond
  • Monitoring tools: Real-time visibility into labeling quality and throughput

Cons:

  • Documentation gaps: Niche or advanced use cases may lack detailed support
  • Custom UI setup isn’t turnkey: Advanced configuration requires frontend experience
  • Template library is limited: Some specialized tasks require building from scratch
  • Pricing can get complex: Need to model costs carefully based on workforce type, volume, and automation

Score: 4.3/5

View Now

8. CVAT (Computer Vision Annotation Tool)

Best for: Open-source visual annotation with advanced manual and semi-automated tools

CVAT is an open-source staple in the computer vision world. 

Originally built by Intel and now actively maintained by the community (including OpenCV), CVAT offers a full-featured suite for annotating image and video datasets across object detection, segmentation, tracking, and pose estimation.

It’s not flashy, but it’s reliable. If your team needs a no-cost, no-vendor-lock way to build training data with flexible deployment (hosted or on-prem), CVAT delivers. You’ll get powerful tools like frame interpolation, intelligent scissors, and polygon annotation all inside a platform built to scale with your team. 

That said, it’s computer vision only. And while its UI is solid, it leans toward experienced users more than casual annotators.

Features

  • Image & video annotation: Bounding boxes, polygons, polylines, 3D cuboids, keypoints, brush tools
  • Semi-automatic labeling: Frame interpolation, smart tools, and integrated ML models
  • Team collaboration: Role-based access, job division, progress tracking, and reviewer flows
  • Format support: Import/export in COCO, YOLO, Pascal VOC, TFRecord, and others
  • Deployment options: Self-host via Docker/Kubernetes or use cloud-hosted cvat.ai
  • Extensibility: Integrates with pipelines like Hugging Face, Roboflow, and custom models
  • UI design: Web-based with shortcuts, guided help, and workspace customization
  • Access control: LDAP integration and user roles for annotation governance

Pros:

  • Free & open-source: Actively maintained with strong community and documentation
  • Powerful annotation tools: Supports all core CV tasks + smart tools for faster labeling
  • Collaborative workflows: Project/task/job structure ideal for multi-user teams
  • Format interoperability: Easily slots into common ML pipelines and toolchains
  • Flexible deployment: Cloud or on-prem depending on your infrastructure

Cons:

  • CV-specific only: Doesn’t support text, audio, or other non-visual data types
  • Workflow customization is limited: Less flexible than some enterprise-grade tools
  • UI complexity: Can feel dense for newcomers or simple use cases
  • Learning curve: Advanced features and integrations require some ramp-up
  • Cloud version needs stable internet: On-prem available but heavier to manage

Score: 4/5

View Now

Comparison: Top Data Labeling Tools & Software

Tool AI-Assisted Labeling Collab Features Workflow Customization Cloud + On-Prem Options Open Source Good for CV Model Feedback Loops
Averroes ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ❌ ✔️ ✔️
SuperAnnotate ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ❌ ✔️ ✔️
Dataloop ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ❌ ✔️ ✔️
Labelbox ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ❌ ✔️ ✔️
Label Studio ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️
Labellerr ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ❌ ✔️ ✔️
V7 ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ❌ ✔️ ✔️
Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ❌ ❌ ✔️ ✔️
CVAT ✔️ ✔️ ❌ ✔️ ✔️ ✔️ ❌

How To Choose?

Choosing the right data labeling tool directly impacts how fast your team can work, how accurate your labels are, and how well your model performs downstream. 

Here are the key criteria you should consider, and how each of the top tools stacks up:

1. Data and Annotation Types Supported

Your labeling tool should support all the data types and annotation methods you’ll need – not just today, but across future projects. 

Whether you’re working with medical scans, PDF documents, chat transcripts, or LiDAR video, coverage matters.

Top performers:

  • SuperAnnotate, Labelbox, Dataloop, and Labellerr are strong all-rounders, supporting images, video, text, audio, and documents.
  • V7 excels in image and video formats, especially for medical and scientific data (DICOM, SVS).
  • Label Studio and SageMaker Ground Truth support diverse modalities and custom annotation schemas.

More limited:

  • CVAT focus primarily on visual inspection. Excellent for computer vision tasks, but not suitable for text or audio pipelines.

2. Customization and Flexibility

Complex use cases often demand tailored workflows. 

If you’re working on unusual datasets or need fine-grained control over label taxonomies, the ability to customize interfaces, logic, and label schemas is critical.

Top performers:

  • Label Studio is best-in-class for open-source flexibility and custom UI configurations.
  • Dataloop, SuperAnnotate, and Labelbox all allow full workflow customization, label hierarchies, and pipeline logic.
  • V7 offers pre-built automation tools but also supports custom pipelines for OCR, segmentation, and QA routing.

More limited:

  • Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth offers customization, but complex workflows or UI changes may require deeper integration work.
  • CVAT offers task configuration but less flexibility in automating workflows compared to others.

3. Team Management and Collaboration

The more people involved in labeling, QA, or review, the more you need clear role management, real-time collaboration tools, and progress tracking. 

These features help keep projects on track and reduce inconsistencies.

Top performers:

  • SuperAnnotate, Dataloop, Labelbox, Labellerr, and V7 offer strong collaboration features like role-based access, project dashboards, and annotation review queues.
  • Label Studio and CVAT support multi-user environments, but are best for teams with technical admin support.

More limited:

  • SageMaker Ground Truth relies heavily on external workforce options like Mechanical Turk, which may be harder to coordinate internally.

4. Integration with Your Tech Stack

The best tools fit into your pipeline, not the other way around. 

Whether you’re training models on AWS or managing data in Databricks, seamless integration prevents bottlenecks and redundant work.

Top performers:

  • SageMaker Ground Truth integrates natively with AWS services like S3, SageMaker Train, and Deploy.
  • Labelbox, Dataloop, SuperAnnotate, and V7 offer APIs, SDKs, and integrations with major cloud and ML platforms.
  • Label Studio and CVAT offer good extensibility via Python SDK and REST APIs for teams that want more control.

More limited:

  • Labellerr offers solid APIs, but has fewer ready-made integrations than some competitors.

5. Scalability and Performance

As your data grows, so should your tool’s ability to keep up without lagging, stalling, or breaking workflows.

Top performers:

  • Dataloop, Labelbox, and Labellerr are purpose-built for petabyte-scale datasets and distributed teams.
  • SuperAnnotate and V7 scale smoothly across annotation projects in automotive, medical, and enterprise domains.

More limited:

  • Label Studio and CVAT can handle large datasets but require optimization and may slow down under heavy load if self-hosted.

Bottom Line

There’s no one-size-fits-all tool.

  • For enterprise-scale multimodal pipelines, Labelbox, SuperAnnotate, or Dataloop stand out.
  • For open-source flexibility, Label Studio and CVAT are hard to beat.
  • If you want speed and accuracy with smart automation, look at Labellerr or V7.
  • For AWS-native ML teams, SageMaker Ground Truth is a natural fit.

Choosing right means thinking long-term – about your data, your model, your team, and the problems you’re trying to solve.

Frequently Asked Questions

What’s the difference between data labeling and data annotation?

These terms are often used interchangeably, but technically, labeling refers to assigning predefined tags (like “cat” or “car”), while annotation includes a broader range of tasks like drawing boxes, segmenting areas, or transcribing speech. Most tools handle both.

How much data do I need before using a labeling tool?

There’s no hard rule, but labeling tools start to show real value once you’re dealing with hundreds or thousands of samples. For small projects, manual labeling might still be faster.

Can I train my own models using the labeled data?

Yes, almost all platforms let you export your annotations in formats compatible with major ML frameworks like TensorFlow, PyTorch, or YOLO. Some tools even support integrated model training workflows.

Do I need technical skills to use these platforms?

It depends. Tools like Labelbox, V7, and Labellerr are user-friendly out of the box. Open-source or highly customizable platforms like Label Studio or CVAT may require some dev setup or API work.

Conclusion

Not every team needs the same tool, and that’s exactly why these options stand out in different ways. 

SuperAnnotate is the go-to for teams juggling massive multimodal datasets with tight QA demands. Dataloop shines when automation, feedback loops, and scale are critical. Labelbox is built for teams who want to control every step from labeling to model tuning. 

If customization is your priority, Label Studio gives you the freedom to build your own workflows, while CVAT offers that flexibility in a more focused, computer vision–only setup. 

V7 brings fast, intuitive tools to precision-heavy projects like medical imaging. Labellerr offers speed and accuracy through automation, especially for enterprise AI teams. And for teams deeply tied into AWS, SageMaker Ground Truth slots into existing infrastructure with minimal fuss. 

Ultimately, the right pick depends on how your team works, what data you’re working with, and how far you’re trying to scale.

Related Blogs

6 Best Data Labeling Companies (2025)
Data Labeling
6 Best Data Labeling Companies (2025)
Learn more
See all blogs
Background Decoration

Experience the Averroes AI Advantage

Elevate Your Visual Inspection Capabilities

Request a Demo Now

Background Decoration
Averroes Ai Automated Visual inspection software
demo@averroes.ai
415.361.9253
55 E 3rd Ave, San Mateo, CA 94401, US

Products

  • Defect Classification
  • Defect Review
  • Defect Segmentation
  • Defect Monitoring
  • Defect Detection
  • Advanced Process Control
  • Virtual Metrology
  • Labeling

Industries

  • Oil and Gas
  • Pharma
  • Electronics
  • Semiconductor
  • Photomask
  • Food and Beverage
  • Solar

Resources

  • Blog
  • Webinars
  • Whitepaper
  • Help center
  • Barcode Generator

Company

  • About
  • Our Mission
  • Our Vision

Partners

  • Become a partner

© 2025 Averroes. All rights reserved

    Terms and Conditions | Privacy Policy